Bowers, Adam R.

teaching MATH 163

Class approval

82.1%

average

81.9%

projected (next term)

i.e. 177 respondents (210 total) approved of this course.


27.7%

Percentile among all classes

34.1%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor approval

92.7%

average

93.2%

projected (next term)

i.e. 196 respondents (210 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


56.4%

Percentile among all classes

71.9%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor-class rating differential

10.6%

average

11.3%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


89.5%

Percentile among all classes

90.4%

Percentile among MATH classes

Grade (GPA)

2.76

average

2.80

projected (next term)


12.1%

Percentile among all classes

44.1%

Percentile among MATH classes

Estimated time commitment

≈5:06

average

≈5:02

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


44.0%

Percentile among all classes

11.8%

Percentile among MATH classes



This chart shows all MATH 163 classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all MATH 163 time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan