Bazargan, Saba

teaching PHIL 28

Class approval

65.7%

average

72.5%

projected (next term)

i.e. 403 respondents (613 total) approved of this course.


6.4%

Percentile among all classes

11.7%

Percentile among PHIL classes

Instructor approval

84.7%

average

90.9%

projected (next term)

i.e. 517 respondents (613 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


33.6%

Percentile among all classes

26.2%

Percentile among PHIL classes

Instructor-class rating differential

19.0%

average

18.5%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


96.8%

Percentile among all classes

94.0%

Percentile among PHIL classes

Grade (GPA)

3.23

average

3.14

projected (next term)


50.1%

Percentile among all classes

76.6%

Percentile among PHIL classes

Estimated time commitment

≈4:38

average

≈4:42

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


33.2%

Percentile among all classes

35.1%

Percentile among PHIL classes



This chart shows all PHIL 28 classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all PHIL 28 time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan