Andolfatto, Peter

teaching BIEB 156

Class approval

75.0%

average

75.0%

projected (next term)

i.e. 12 respondents (16 total) approved of this course.


15.1%

Percentile among all classes

6.5%

Percentile among BIEB classes

Instructor approval

87.5%

average

87.5%

projected (next term)

i.e. 14 respondents (16 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


39.9%

Percentile among all classes

21.7%

Percentile among BIEB classes

Instructor-class rating differential

12.5%

average

12.5%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


91.9%

Percentile among all classes

100.0%

Percentile among BIEB classes

Grade (GPA)

2.74

average

2.74

projected (next term)


11.2%

Percentile among all classes

10.9%

Percentile among BIEB classes

Estimated time commitment

≈4:37

average

≈4:37

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


32.7%

Percentile among all classes

34.8%

Percentile among BIEB classes



This chart shows all BIEB 156 classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all BIEB 156 time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan