Chen, Yi

teaching NANO 120A

Class approval

92.1%

average

89.4%

projected (next term)

i.e. 51 respondents (55 total) approved of this course.


60.8%

Percentile among all classes

59.0%

Percentile among NANO classes

Instructor approval

90.3%

average

104.5%

projected (next term)

i.e. 48 respondents (55 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


48.1%

Percentile among all classes

62.3%

Percentile among NANO classes

Instructor-class rating differential

-1.9%

average

15.0%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


32.2%

Percentile among all classes

47.5%

Percentile among NANO classes

Grade (GPA)

3.44

average

3.76

projected (next term)


68.8%

Percentile among all classes

57.4%

Percentile among NANO classes

Estimated time commitment

≈7:36

average

≈10:28

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


84.2%

Percentile among all classes

75.4%

Percentile among NANO classes



This chart shows all NANO 120A classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all NANO 120A time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan