Allen, Andrew Stewart

teaching MUS 13AS

Class approval

83.1%

average

96.9%

projected (next term)

i.e. 234 respondents (293 total) approved of this course.


29.8%

Percentile among all classes

28.7%

Percentile among MUS classes

Instructor approval

90.8%

average

95.4%

projected (next term)

i.e. 262 respondents (293 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


49.8%

Percentile among all classes

47.1%

Percentile among MUS classes

Instructor-class rating differential

7.7%

average

-1.5%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


83.5%

Percentile among all classes

84.1%

Percentile among MUS classes

Grade (GPA)

3.53

average

4.31

projected (next term)


76.7%

Percentile among all classes

49.2%

Percentile among MUS classes

Estimated time commitment

≈3:23

average

≈3:03

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


8.6%

Percentile among all classes

48.4%

Percentile among MUS classes



This chart shows all MUS 13AS classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all MUS 13AS time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan