Cassedy, Steven Dennis

teaching LTEN 158

Class approval

80.3%

average

57.3%

projected (next term)

i.e. 30 respondents (38 total) approved of this course.


24.1%

Percentile among all classes

9.4%

Percentile among LTEN classes

Instructor approval

80.6%

average

75.1%

projected (next term)

i.e. 31 respondents (38 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


26.1%

Percentile among all classes

8.7%

Percentile among LTEN classes

Instructor-class rating differential

0.3%

average

17.8%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


56.5%

Percentile among all classes

60.9%

Percentile among LTEN classes

Grade (GPA)

3.07

average

3.36

projected (next term)


36.2%

Percentile among all classes

13.0%

Percentile among LTEN classes

Estimated time commitment

≈6:24

average

≈8:10

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


69.7%

Percentile among all classes

74.6%

Percentile among LTEN classes



This chart shows all LTEN 158 classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all LTEN 158 time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan