Campbell, Robert Harold

teaching MGT 105

Class approval

96.2%

average

96.2%

projected (next term)

i.e. 968 respondents (1007 total) approved of this course.


77.6%

Percentile among all classes

81.8%

Percentile among MGT classes

Instructor approval

97.1%

average

97.1%

projected (next term)

i.e. 978 respondents (1007 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


74.7%

Percentile among all classes

80.3%

Percentile among MGT classes

Instructor-class rating differential

0.9%

average

0.9%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


58.6%

Percentile among all classes

63.5%

Percentile among MGT classes

Grade (GPA)

3.64

average

3.64

projected (next term)


84.9%

Percentile among all classes

87.6%

Percentile among MGT classes

Estimated time commitment

≈3:42

average

≈3:42

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


12.8%

Percentile among all classes

16.8%

Percentile among MGT classes



This chart shows all MGT 105 classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all MGT 105 time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan