Brydges, Stacey

teaching CHEM 7LM

Class approval

89.8%

average

86.1%

projected (next term)

i.e. 267 respondents (297 total) approved of this course.


51.5%

Percentile among all classes

71.6%

Percentile among CHEM classes

Instructor approval

94.6%

average

98.5%

projected (next term)

i.e. 281 respondents (297 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


64.1%

Percentile among all classes

77.3%

Percentile among CHEM classes

Instructor-class rating differential

4.8%

average

12.4%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


75.1%

Percentile among all classes

63.6%

Percentile among CHEM classes

Grade (GPA)

3.57

average

3.74

projected (next term)


79.7%

Percentile among all classes

96.6%

Percentile among CHEM classes

Estimated time commitment

≈9:09

average

≈8:17

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


93.6%

Percentile among all classes

89.2%

Percentile among CHEM classes



This chart shows all CHEM 7LM classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all CHEM 7LM time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan