Bryan, Paul Anthony

teaching MATH 20D

Class approval

87.2%

average

118.2%

projected (next term)

i.e. 85 respondents (107 total) approved of this course.


42.5%

Percentile among all classes

54.1%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor approval

50.7%

average

132.6%

projected (next term)

i.e. 32 respondents (107 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


4.5%

Percentile among all classes

11.3%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor-class rating differential

-36.5%

average

14.4%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


1.7%

Percentile among all classes

6.5%

Percentile among MATH classes

Grade (GPA)

3.04

average

2.66

projected (next term)


32.9%

Percentile among all classes

79.0%

Percentile among MATH classes

Estimated time commitment

≈8:21

average

≈12:00

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


90.0%

Percentile among all classes

85.8%

Percentile among MATH classes



This chart shows all MATH 20D classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all MATH 20D time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan