Bradic, Jelena

teaching MATH 181B

Class approval

91.0%

average

87.3%

projected (next term)

i.e. 176 respondents (196 total) approved of this course.


56.3%

Percentile among all classes

71.7%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor approval

82.2%

average

75.7%

projected (next term)

i.e. 158 respondents (196 total) approved of this instructor's teaching of the course.


28.9%

Percentile among all classes

45.8%

Percentile among MATH classes

Instructor-class rating differential

-8.8%

average

-11.6%

projected (next term)

This is the difference between the instructor and class approval ratings. A higher value indicates a professor which can compensate for the negative qualities of a class.


16.2%

Percentile among all classes

32.5%

Percentile among MATH classes

Grade (GPA)

3.13

average

2.83

projected (next term)


40.7%

Percentile among all classes

85.0%

Percentile among MATH classes

Estimated time commitment

≈8:24

average

≈6:25

projected (next term)

The average amount of time outside of class needed per week.


90.3%

Percentile among all classes

86.3%

Percentile among MATH classes



This chart shows all MATH 181B classes' instructor and class recommended percentages. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

The top right quadrant represents good classes with good professors. Bottom right represents good classes with underwhelming professors, top left represents bad classes redeemed by their professors, and bottom left represents classes with subpar professors and classes.


This chart shows all MATH 181B time commitments and average GPAs. The dotted lines represent averages for each axis.

A point in the top right quadrant is an easy but time-consuming class. Bottom right is hard and time-consuming, bottom left is hard but light on workload, and top left is easy in all respects.

(C) 2019 David Cao, Tung Doan